Abnormalia 5/Abnormalia 5.adf/Articles/73.pak/73.pak

Text File | 1994-10-23 | 4KB | 64 lines

TITLE:A COMMENT ABOUT SCENOLOGY - THE MADNESS SPREADS
PALETTE:0223 099b 08ba 0cc9

                           A COMMENT ABOUT SCENOLOGY

                              By Cyclon of Eskimos


Scenology - the analysis of scene-people is a very young field of science.
The interested people (so am I) have to thank the pioneers, who made it possible
with  several publications that younger generations of scientist can make use of
the  roots, the young tree took.  Names like Beppe, Mop and RokDaZone perpetuate
in  our  minds.   The  history  of  humanity,  of science shows that often wrong
theories were spread through media.  I am here to warn!
Scenologists  have to accept opinions of outsiders - independent ones.
Progress is only reached with the system of "thesis + antithesis = synthesis".
It  is  not  my intention to depreciate all studies of our pioneers.  Just don't
study  our  term  without abundant considerations of already known publications.
Different from todays knowledge are a great number of things.  To mention is the
false  consideration through hundreds of years that the ground we are walking on
is  flat  - a round plate.  This false theory caused  that seamen were afraid of
leaving  the  traditional  seaways.   They have been afraid the ships would fall
down  at  the  end  of the world.  Often rebellion followed orders on sail ships
from european countries in the middle ages.  That was just an example of extreme
false  consideration,  which  counted  as  untouchable.   No other theories were
accepted.  Live, study and publish with this consciousness.

Scenology  is  something  that  was  always  needed  by our rotting scene.  This
science  analysis  deep  the  freudian shoots in scene's eyes, the motivation of
sceners for doing several nonsense in their poor manner.  Scenology asks why and
under  which  surrounding  things relate.  Not only like in different mags where
beginnings  of  the  scener-phenomenon  were  dealt  with.   The  existance of a
scener-phenomenon  was  somehow  known, special scener-behaviour was blaimed and
taken  into  account.   But  never  someone analyzed why sceners behave in their
manner.  Texts out of the wondering situation of serveral sceners were published
in  the  intention  to  fill space.  In need of articles some editors decided to
make  the  appearance  of adverts depending of an article.  Sceners had to write
articles  with  their  intellect to get 3 free adverts.
The result are So-What? articles.

Few  mags  only feature them.  It seems, that several mags are released to bring
the own group a good reputation.  It is so simple to code a magazine.
Just  choose  a  maineditor who writes some articles.  Some other stupid sceners
will  send  articles, and the scene magazine is ready to release.  The result is
the  opposite  - the reputation of the group sinks.  Scenology already dedicated
studies concerning this scene-topic.

The  quality  of  sceners  to have their names written everywhere wasn't studied
enough in my opinion.  Let's term this phenomenon with "tag-O-joy".
Explainable  is  that  fact  with the human shoot to perpetuate themselves.  But
"tag-O-joy" is a perverted growth of civilization (graffiti).

Scenology  should  stand  over  the  movement  like it does actually.  But don't
forget  to  integrate  yourself  and the science into scene, otherwise scenology
gets into blabla and no one will take it serious.  Be always aware, that you are
a scener, and that selfcritics only can be good.

Another  note  to  the  scientists:  Don't forget the origin of a scener.
He  is  always human, his behaviour is human, a handle is no abstraktum, it is a
human  behind  every handle.  Scene is a field of life.  Analyze scene with this
consciousness.